Post by account_disabled on Jan 1, 2024 4:39:18 GMT
Disruption is the coveted object of desire for many brands eager to get noticed by giving a complete twist to their field of activity and interacting with their audience in radically different ways . However, in a world where cacophony often prevails (caused by absolutely deafening messages), disruption often degenerates into chaos , a chaos in which brands that once dedicated themselves to the art of disruption end up becoming victims. molds (and effectively smashed them to pieces). From disruption to self-destruction there is often only one step. And good proof of this is the once powerful (and now in low hours) brand of Donald Trump , explains Jamie Williams in an article for Campaign . The rise and development of the Trump brand and its impact on his homeland, the United States, cannot be ignored in any way. After all, last November 74 million Americans voted for Trump , more than any other sitting president in American history. Despite the multiple scandals that hampered his mandate in the last four years, the president maintained the support of approximately 40% of the electorate.
Trump, a “challenger brand” that crossed the fine line between disruption and self-destruction With his brand , laced with anger (the anger of millions of Americans who feel neglected by the "liberal elites"), Trump managed to Phone Number List channel the emotions (foreign to reason) of a vast group of citizens filled with disaffection for his own benefit. by a system that seemed to have forgotten about them. The "liberal elites" and the "mainstream" media have become in the last four years the common enemy of Trump and his acolytes, who, far from seeing their anger diminished, intensified it to infinity and beyond during the president's term. president. In his day, Trump was a disruptive brand that managed to connect with a large part of the American electorate, but as has now been demonstrated, the line between disruption and self-destruction is extraordinarily tenuous . And some actions are not worthy of being forgiven either, even by the most faithful adjuncts of "Trumpism." When, after the elections on November 3, Trump refused to accept Joe Biden's victory and hid behind alleged electoral fraud to avoid admitting his defeat, many political experts prophesied that "Trumpism" would gain even more strength and continue to be the dominant trend in the Republican Party.
But last week the Trump brand, the one that was destined to continue fighting in the next four years, took a turn towards its own self-destruction , Williams emphasizes. “Trumpism” was destined to remain strong for years to come, but the events of January 6 ended up blowing up the Trump brand. Until then, many tolerated the president's vitriolic outbursts on Twitter , alluded to the successes achieved by the US economy before the coronavirus pandemic entered the scene and also remembered the peace agreements achieved by Trump in the Middle East. Until recently, "Trumpism" seemed to enjoy a solid base to break out strongly again in the 2024 presidential elections. But everything blew up on November 6 with the assault on the Capitol. Even in the minds of many conservatives (once fervent Trump acolytes), “Trumpism” is now synonymous with chaos, terrorism, and something strikingly close to a coup. Many of those who in recent years danced the water for Trump in the hope of inheriting his followers now realize that the shot has backfired on them . They risked a lot and have finally come out scalded (probably never to recover). Trump, that president who based his election campaign on social networks and even governed from these platforms.
Trump, a “challenger brand” that crossed the fine line between disruption and self-destruction With his brand , laced with anger (the anger of millions of Americans who feel neglected by the "liberal elites"), Trump managed to Phone Number List channel the emotions (foreign to reason) of a vast group of citizens filled with disaffection for his own benefit. by a system that seemed to have forgotten about them. The "liberal elites" and the "mainstream" media have become in the last four years the common enemy of Trump and his acolytes, who, far from seeing their anger diminished, intensified it to infinity and beyond during the president's term. president. In his day, Trump was a disruptive brand that managed to connect with a large part of the American electorate, but as has now been demonstrated, the line between disruption and self-destruction is extraordinarily tenuous . And some actions are not worthy of being forgiven either, even by the most faithful adjuncts of "Trumpism." When, after the elections on November 3, Trump refused to accept Joe Biden's victory and hid behind alleged electoral fraud to avoid admitting his defeat, many political experts prophesied that "Trumpism" would gain even more strength and continue to be the dominant trend in the Republican Party.
But last week the Trump brand, the one that was destined to continue fighting in the next four years, took a turn towards its own self-destruction , Williams emphasizes. “Trumpism” was destined to remain strong for years to come, but the events of January 6 ended up blowing up the Trump brand. Until then, many tolerated the president's vitriolic outbursts on Twitter , alluded to the successes achieved by the US economy before the coronavirus pandemic entered the scene and also remembered the peace agreements achieved by Trump in the Middle East. Until recently, "Trumpism" seemed to enjoy a solid base to break out strongly again in the 2024 presidential elections. But everything blew up on November 6 with the assault on the Capitol. Even in the minds of many conservatives (once fervent Trump acolytes), “Trumpism” is now synonymous with chaos, terrorism, and something strikingly close to a coup. Many of those who in recent years danced the water for Trump in the hope of inheriting his followers now realize that the shot has backfired on them . They risked a lot and have finally come out scalded (probably never to recover). Trump, that president who based his election campaign on social networks and even governed from these platforms.